Dominic Raab has strongly criticized the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) for stopping the first deportation flight to Rwanda. The Deputy Prime Minister stated the late legal intervention was wrong and inappropriate. He believes this action proves the urgent need to update Britain’s human rights laws.
The flight was grounded at the last minute after a specific ruling from the court in Strasbourg. Raab argues this decision overstepped the court’s actual powers.
Questioning the Authority of the European Court
Dominic Raab expressed frustration with how the intervention took place. He suggested that the court acted beyond its mandate by issuing a temporary injunction. This order effectively stopped the plane from taking off on Tuesday night.
The Deputy Prime Minister focused his criticism on the technical nature of the order. He referred to the “Rule 39” interim orders used by the judges. According to Raab, these specific rules are based on internal procedures rather than the formal European Convention itself.
He argued that such orders should not have the power to block UK law in this manner. Raab stated firmly that these procedural rules “are not grounded in the European Convention.” He believes they should not have a legally binding effect on the decisions made by the British government.
This incident has pushed the government to look closely at current laws. Raab confirmed that this strengthens the argument for a new British Bill of Rights. He said:
“We will stay within the convention but make sure the procedural framework is improved.”
The goal is to stop foreign offenders from using human rights laws to avoid deportation. The government wants to limit the ability of the Strasbourg court to issue these kinds of commands when they may not have the explicit power to do so.
The Battle to Ground the Flight
The cancellation of the flight was the result of a chaotic day of legal battles. The government had planned to send a group of asylum seekers to Rwanda as part of a new partnership. Lawyers for the asylum seekers launched multiple challenges in UK courts.
The case went through the High Court, the Court of Appeal, and the Supreme Court. In the UK courts, the judges allowed the flight to proceed. However, the European Court of Human Rights stepped in at the very last moment.
Their intervention meant the flight could not leave. This has created significant uncertainty for the government’s plans. It is now unclear when the next attempt to fly asylum seekers to East Africa will happen.
Key moments in the legal timeline included:
- Challenges were rejected by the UK High Court.
- The UK Supreme Court refused to hear a final appeal.
- The ECHR issued an interim measure shortly before takeoff.
- The plane was grounded with passengers already on board.
Raab stated he could not give a specific date for the next flight. He accused the European court of intervening on “the vaguest of grounds.” This delay is a major setback for the policy aimed at deterring illegal channel crossings.
Calls to Leave the Convention
The decision by the ECHR has angered many in the Conservative party. Some Members of Parliament have called for extreme measures. They want the UK to cut ties completely with the European court.
MPs like Jonathan Gullis have suggested that Britain should leave the jurisdiction of the ECHR. The court was established in 1959 to protect civil and political rights. Leaving it would be a significant shift in British foreign and legal policy.
However, Dominic Raab rejected these calls for a total exit. He insisted that the UK can fix the problem without leaving the convention entirely. His solution focuses on reform rather than withdrawal.
Raab explained that the upcoming Bill of Rights would address these issues legally. The plan is to change how the UK interprets rulings from Strasbourg. The government aims to ensure that British courts have the final say over deportation matters.
| Government Position (Raab) | Hardline Critic Position |
|---|---|
| Remain in the ECHR | Withdraw from the ECHR |
| Reform internal rules and procedures | Ignore rulings completely |
| Pass a new Bill of Rights | Cut all ties immediately |
By staying in the convention, the government hopes to maintain international standards while regaining control. Raab emphasized that they would address the issue “squarely” with new legislation.
Comparing Refugee Situations
During his comments, Raab also defended the government’s record on helping refugees. He was asked about the difference in treatment between Ukrainians and those arriving on small boats. Critics have pointed out that Ukrainian refugees have been welcomed differently.
Raab argued that the situations are not the same. He highlighted the importance of proximity in refugee crises. He noted that most refugees prefer to stay close to their home country so they can eventually return.
“We have shown a big-hearted approach, whether it was in relation to Afghanistan, Hong Kong or Ukraine.”
He explained that security is a major factor in the government’s thinking. For asylum seekers crossing the Channel, the government insists on strict checks. Raab stated that they must verify the truth of asylum claims to protect the UK.
There is a concern about people abusing the system. Raab warned that public trust is undermined if people who wish the UK harm enter fraudulently. This security aspect is a key driver behind the Rwanda policy.
For more context on the government’s legal stance, you can read about the Bill of Rights Bill here.
Uncertainty for Future Deportations
The immediate future of the Rwanda deportation flights is now in doubt. The government remains committed to the policy despite this hurdle. However, the legal path is complicated.
Raab’s comments show that the government is preparing for a long legal fight. They intend to reduce the ability of foreign offenders to use the “right to family life” as a reason to stay. This has been a common legal argument in deportation cases.
The government believes the new partnership with Rwanda will eventually work. They argue it is necessary to break the business model of people smugglers. You can read more about the initial cancellation of the flight here.
Until the new Bill of Rights is passed or the legal challenges are resolved, flights may remain grounded. The government is looking for ways to schedule a new flight as soon as possible. But without a change in the legal framework, they face the risk of similar interventions.
The situation remains fluid. The Home Office and the Ministry of Justice are working together to find a solution. For now, the plane remains on the ground, and the debate over human rights laws continues to dominate politics.
This event marks a significant clash between the UK government and European human rights judges. It highlights the tension between national border control and international legal obligations. The coming months will likely see more court battles and fierce political debate.
The government is determined to push through its reforms. They see this as a matter of sovereignty and border security. Whether the new Bill of Rights will solve the issue remains to be seen.
This latest ruling has only fueled the fire for those wanting change. Raab’s strong words indicate that the government will not back down easily. The next steps will determine the future of UK asylum policy for years to come.
The standoff involving the ECHR has strengthened the government’s resolve to overhaul the Human Rights Act. Raab and his colleagues are now more focused than ever on passing the new legislation. This will likely be a central theme in parliament soon.
The grounded flight is a symbol of the complex challenges facing the government. It shows that policy announcements are not enough without legal backing. The fight over the Rwanda plan is far from over.
Ultimately, this is about who decides who can stay in the UK. Raab insists it should be the British government, not a court in Strasbourg. The public waits to see if the government can deliver on its promises.
The clash over the Rwanda flight highlights a deep divide in how to handle the migration crisis. Dominic Raab stands firm that the current system is broken. This event is a clear signal that major legal changes are on the horizon.
Please share this important update on social media. Use hashtags like #RwandaFlight #DominicRaab #UKPolitics #ECHR to join the conversation. We want to hear your thoughts in the comments below.
Disclaimer: This article discusses sensitive topics regarding immigration, legal deportation, and government policy. The information provided is based on news reports and official statements. It does not constitute legal advice.
